You are here

Monitoring the flu strains

Primary tabs

New York Times January 9, 2009

Major Flu Strain Found Resistant to Leading Drug, Puzzling Scientists
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

Virtually all the dominant strain of flu in the United States this season is resistant to the leading antiviral drug Tamiflu, and scientists and health officials are trying to figure out why.

The problem is not yet a public health crisis because this has been a below-average flu season so far, and because the Tamiflu-resistant strain, one of three circulating, is still susceptible to other drugs. But infectious disease specialists are worried nonetheless.

Last winter, about 11 percent of the throat swabs from patients with the most common type of flu that were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for genetic typing showed a Tamiflu-resistant strain. This season, 99 percent do.

“It’s quite shocking,” said Dr. Kent A. Sepkowitz, director of infection control at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. “We’ve never lost an antimicrobial this fast. It blew me away.”

The single mutation that creates Tamiflu resistance appears to be spontaneous, and not a reaction to overuse of the drug. It may have occurred in Asia, and it was widespread in Europe last year. In response, the disease control agency issued new guidelines two weeks ago. They urged doctors to test suspected flu cases as quickly as possible to see if they are influenza A or influenza B, and if they are A, whether they are H1 or H3 viruses.

The only Tamiflu-resistant strain is an H1N1. Its resistance mutation could fade out, an agency scientist said, or a different flu strain could overtake H1N1 in importance, but right now it causes almost all flu cases in the country, except in a few mountain states, where H3N2 is prevalent.

Complicating the problem, antiviral drugs work only if taken within the first 48 hours of infection. A patient with severe flu could be given the wrong drug and die of pneumonia before test results come in. So the new guidelines suggest that doctors check with their state health departments to see which strains are most common locally and treat for them.

“We’re a fancy hospital, and we can’t even do the A versus B test in a timely fashion,” Dr. Sepkowitz said. “I have no idea what a doctor in an unfancy office without that lab backup can do.”

If a Tamiflu-resistant strain is suspected, the disease control agency suggests using a similar drug, Relenza. But Relenza is harder to take; it is a powder that must be inhaled and can cause lung spasms, and it is not recommended for children under 7.

Relenza, made by GlaxoSmithKline, is known generically as zanamivir. Tamiflu, made by Roche, is known generically as oseltamivir.

Alternatively, patients who have trouble inhaling Relenza can take a mixture of Tamiflu and rimantadine, an older generic drug that the agency stopped recommending two years ago because so many flu strains were resistant to it. By chance, the new Tamiflu-resistant H1N1 strain is not.

“The bottom line is that we should have more antiviral drugs,” said Dr. Arnold S. Monto, a flu expert at the University of Michigan’s School of Public Health. “And we should be looking into multidrug combinations.”

New York City had tested only two flu samples as of Jan. 6, and both were Tamiflu-resistant, said Dr. Annie Fine, an epidemiologist at the city’s health department. Flu cases in the city are only “here and there,” Dr. Fine said, and there have been no outbreaks in nursing homes. Elderly patients and those with the AIDS virus or on cancer therapy are most at risk.

But, she added, because of the resistance problem, the city is speeding its laboratory procedures so it can do both crucial tests in one day.

“And we strongly suggest that people get a flu shot,” Dr. Fine said. “There’s plenty of time and plenty of vaccine.”

Exactly how the Tamiflu-resistant strain emerged is a mystery, several experts said.

Resistance appeared several years ago in Japan, which uses more Tamiflu than any other country, and experts feared it would spread.

But the Japanese strains were found only in patients already treated with Tamiflu, and they were “weak” — that is, they did not transmit to other people.

“This looks like a spontaneous development of resistance in the most unlikely places — possibly in Norway, which doesn’t use antivirals at all,” Dr. Monto said.

Dr. Henry L. Niman, a biochemist in Pittsburgh who runs recombinomics.com, a Web site that tracks the genetics of flu cases worldwide, has been warning for months that Tamiflu resistance in H1N1 was spreading.

Dr. Niman argues that it started in China, where Tamiflu use is rare, was seen last year in Norway, France and Russia, then moved to South Africa (where winter is June to September), and back to the Northern Hemisphere in November.

The mutation conferring resistance to Tamiflu, known in the shorthand of genetics as H274Y on the N gene, was actually, Dr. Niman said, “just a passenger, totally unrelated to Tamiflu usage, but hitchhiking on another change.”

The other mutation, he said, known as A193T on the H gene, made the virus better at infecting people.

Furthermore, Dr. Niman blamed mismatched flu vaccines for helping the A193T mutation spread. Flu vaccines typically protect against three flu strains, but none have contained protections against the A193T mutation.

Dr. Joseph S. Bresee, chief of flu prevention at the disease control agency, said he thought Dr. Niman was “probably right” about the resistance having innocently piggy-backed on a mutation on the H gene — which creates the spike on the outside of the virus that lets it break into human cells. But Dr. Bresee said he doubted that last year’s flu vaccine was to blame, since the H1 strain in it protected “not perfectly, but relatively well” against H1N1 infection.

Dr. Niman said he was worried about two aspects of the new resistance to Tamiflu. Preliminary data out of Norway, he said, suggested that the new strain was more likely to cause pneumonia.

The flu typically kills about 36,000 Americans a year, the C.D.C. estimates, most of them the elderly or the very young, or people with problems like asthma or heart disease; pneumonia is usually the fatal complication.

And while seasonal flu is relatively mild, the Tamiflu resistance could transfer onto the H5N1 bird flu circulating in Asia and Egypt, which has killed millions of birds and about 250 people since 2003. Although H5N1 has not turned into a pandemic strain, as many experts recently feared it would, it still could — and Tamiflu resistance in that case would be a disaster.

Comments

From Greg Dworkin to the Pandefense Group

Greg is questioning whether Public Health experts rather than manufacturers should choose the flu strain and strategy regarding the annual flu vaccine, in that 5 of the last 7 years, the major stain of flu was missed.

http://www.thestar.com/article/569149

It appears there may be a partial flu shot mismatch again this year, with early data from Canada, the United States and Britain suggesting the vaccine component meant to protect against influenza B is not a match for the flu B viruses causing the most disease.

Predicting which family of influenza B viruses will dominate in a coming year – and therefore should be covered by the flu shot – is a challenge that has defied the experts in five of the last seven flu seasons, at least so far as disease patterns in North America are concerned.

...

As for whether or not the flu shot should contain two B components, McGeer thinks it's an idea whose time may have come.

"We're ... going to have to try to deal with the fact that we've now got these two lineages and they look like they're staying. It would be very helpful to know what the right thing to do is," she says.

But Bresee sounds unsure whether the benefits – fewer people catching flu B and fewer people hospitalized because of it – will in the end outweigh the added challenge for manufacturers and the added cost.

"It's easy for us to do the science and do the models. And it's easy for us to give an opinion about the relative health benefits. What I don't know is our FDA partners, our industry partners – what these data mean for them," he admits.

"Whether a good idea meets with practical considerations that make it impossible, I don't know."

howdy folks
Page loaded in 0.347 seconds.